Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn.
In between
Estimated position
What does Právo na pravdu propose?
Právo na pravdu (Right to Truth, PRAVDA) is a new party registered in November 2025 and led since its founding congress in January 2026 by lawyer and businessman Zoroslav Kollár. It grew out of a civic association of the same name. It has not yet run in national or European elections and has no MPs.
It has never been in government, and polls in September and October 2026 put it at 2.2–2.8%. Its slogan is ‘Slovensko na prvom mieste’ (Slovakia first). It wants more sovereignty from the EU and a veto for every member state, but sees a unilateral exit as risky. It calls for an immediate end to the war in Ukraine, criticises sanctions on Russia and rejects the EU migration pact. It proposes lower taxes on work and businesses, an imperative mandate for MPs and an end to public funding for political NGOs.
Právo na pravdu has a documented position on 42 of the 42 test questions, across 12 topics: 13 in favour, 7 in between and 22 against. Take the test to find out how well you match Právo na pravdu.
Profile reviewed on 16/10/2026.
💰 Právo na pravdu on Economy and taxes
4 questions: 1 in favour, 2 in between and 1 against.
Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax.
In between
Reasoning: It wants to collect far more tax from foreign retail chains, banks and energy firms by policing transfer pricing, but rejects new special levies.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 11.
The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes.
Strongly in favour
Reasoning: It argues the state must first cut its own spending and use the savings to lower taxes: not more taxes, but lower ones.
The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money.
Against
Reasoning: It criticises the VAT rise but proposes unifying VAT rates to collect more; it seeks a 5% rate only for the first home of people under 35.
🛒 Právo na pravdu on Cost of living and housing
3 questions: 3 in favour, 0 in between and 0 against.
In favour
Reasoning: Its programme calls for regulating energy prices to protect families and businesses; in 2025 it urged replacing blanket subsidies with targeted schemes.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 7.
The state should hold a majority stake in large energy companies.
Strongly in favour
Reasoning: Its programme wants the state to gain ownership and decisive control of strategic energy companies, and to regain control over water too.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 7.
The state should cap supermarkets' profit margins on basic foods.
In favour
Reasoning: It condemns foreign chains' mark-ups of up to 250% on bread and wants state control over food, though it does not propose a cap on margins.
👵 Právo na pravdu on Pensions and benefits
4 questions: 1 in favour, 0 in between and 3 against.
Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension.
Strongly against
Reasoning: Its programme takes it for granted that the 13th pension is kept and gradually raised, and in 2026 it flatly rejected cutting any current pension.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 10.
The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap.
Against
Estimated position
Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them.
Against
Reasoning: It wants more support for families, but paid for by cutting state spending: it rejects tax rises and promises to lower taxes.
People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training.
In favour
Reasoning: Its programme would tie social assistance to an obligation to work or train; in 2026, speaking about Roma, it said it would give nothing to anyone for free.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 12.
🏥 Právo na pravdu on Healthcare
3 questions: 1 in favour, 0 in between and 2 against.
There should be a single public health insurer instead of several competing ones.
Strongly in favour
Reasoning: In 2026 it proposed that public health insurance be run by a single state insurer, so that money does not end up in dividends.
Patients should be able to pay extra for healthcare above the standard level.
Against
Estimated position
Slovakia should actively recruit doctors and nurses from abroad.
Against
Estimated position
🕊️ Právo na pravdu on Ukraine and Russia
6 questions: 3 in favour, 0 in between and 3 against.
Slovakia should resume sending state military aid to Ukraine.
Strongly against
Reasoning: It sees the war in Ukraine as not Slovakia's war, criticises the €690 million of military aid already given and calls for an immediate end to the war.
The EU should lift its sanctions on Russia.
Strongly in favour
Reasoning: Its programme rejects sanctions against Russia and the ban on Russian energy imports because they harm the economy; it says they have not stopped the war.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 6.
Slovakia should be able to keep buying Russian gas and oil after 2027.
Strongly in favour
Reasoning: Its programme rejects the ban on trade with Russia, above all on importing Russian oil and gas, because it harms the Slovak economy.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 6.
Ukraine should be able to join the EU once it meets all the conditions.
Against
Reasoning: Its programme says Ukraine does not belong in the EU while the war lasts; in 2025 it launched a petition against backing its entry even after meeting the full acquis.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 8.
Russian assets frozen in the EU should be used to help Ukraine.
Against
Estimated position
Support for refugees from Ukraine should be cut back.
In favour
Reasoning: In 2026 it criticised that over 80% of the €4.92 billion of aid to Ukraine went on refugees and said Slovakia should help Slovaks first.
🇪🇺 Právo na pravdu on European Union
3 questions: 0 in favour, 0 in between and 3 against.
Strongly against
Reasoning: Its programme calls for a return to national sovereignty and for every country in the EU to be able to use its veto, without distinction.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 5.
If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it.
Against
Reasoning: Its programme sees unilateral exit from the EU as a high risk and wants to renew the EU, not abolish it, while preparing a coordinated move if it breaks up; it does not call for a referendum.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 5.
The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law.
Strongly against
Reasoning: Its programme condemns the EU for using EU funds, lawsuits and sanctions to blackmail member states in the name of the rule of law.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 5.
🛡️ Právo na pravdu on Defence and NATO
3 questions: 0 in favour, 2 in between and 1 against.
Slovakia should leave NATO and become a militarily neutral country.
In between
Reasoning: In 2025 it held up neutral Austria as an example of spending less on arms; in 2026 it urged defending Slovak interests within NATO, without proposing to leave.
Slovakia should increase defence spending to meet NATO's new target.
Against
Reasoning: In 2025 it called rearmament "the new covid"; in 2026 it accepted higher NATO spending only if it brings results and contracts for Slovak firms.
Slovakia should withdraw from its defence cooperation agreement with the United States.
In between
Estimated position
⚖️ Právo na pravdu on Rule of law and democracy
5 questions: 2 in favour, 1 in between and 2 against.
Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption.
Against
Estimated position
Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight.
Strongly in favour
Reasoning: Its programme would stop public funding of political NGOs and decries foreign influence; in 2025 it sought investigations into NGOs funded from the US.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 8.
Against
Reasoning: In 2026 its leader criticised the Prosecutor General for using Section 363 in cases of politicians and oligarchs, and proposed replacing the prosecution service with a state attorney's office.
Source: Stanovisko predsedu strany Zoroslava Kollára k zriadeniu štátneho zastupiteľstva, 9. 2. 2026.
In between
Estimated position
A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part.
In favour
Reasoning: It backs a functional, binding referendum and in 2026 proposed constitutional changes to settle its binding force; it did not support the Demokrati referendum.
🤝 Právo na pravdu on Values and society
4 questions: 2 in favour, 1 in between and 1 against.
Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally.
Against
Estimated position
Abortion should be more restricted than it is now.
In between
Estimated position
Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU.
Strongly in favour
Reasoning: Its programme objects to the EU meddling in family policy and cultural questions, which it says are for states to decide, and demands respect for their values-based identity.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 5.
Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence.
In favour
Estimated position
🗣️ Právo na pravdu on Minorities
4 questions: 0 in favour, 1 in between and 3 against.
Against
Estimated position
The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed.
Against
Estimated position
People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship.
In between
Estimated position
Against
Reasoning: It prioritises work and education for Roma, but with clear rules and nothing for free; it wants scrutiny of how over €1 billion already spent was used.
🌱 Právo na pravdu on Energy and climate
2 questions: 0 in favour, 0 in between and 2 against.
Slovakia should stick to the EU goal of reaching climate neutrality by 2050.
Against
Reasoning: Its programme rejects the Green Deal, the ETS and Brussels' green diktat, though it relies on nuclear and hydro power and proposes cutting CO2 through afforestation.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 6.
Sales of new petrol and diesel cars should be banned from 2035.
Strongly against
Reasoning: Its programme explicitly rejects the ban on combustion engines, along with the Green Deal and the ETS, because they raise costs.
Source: Programové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 6.
🌍 Právo na pravdu on Migration
1 question: 0 in favour, 0 in between and 1 against.
Against
Reasoning: In 2026 it said legal migration is also a problem and called for strict rules for anyone wanting to work in Slovakia and fines for firms exploiting cheap labour.
“Estimated position” means we have inferred it from the party's manifesto and statements as a whole, without a document that states it explicitly. If you know of one, write to us: we will correct it and cite it.
Frequently asked questions about Právo na pravdu
Is Právo na pravdu a left-wing or right-wing party?
On our political compass, calculated from the party’s positions on the test statements, Právo na pravdu is on the left on the economy (−36) and on the conservative side on values (+46), on a scale from −100 to +100.
What does Právo na pravdu support most strongly?
Právo na pravdu fully agrees with these statements:
- The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes.
- The state should hold a majority stake in large energy companies.
- There should be a single public health insurer instead of several competing ones.
- The EU should lift its sanctions on Russia.
- Slovakia should be able to keep buying Russian gas and oil after 2027.
- Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight.
What does Právo na pravdu oppose most strongly?
Právo na pravdu fully disagrees with these statements:
- Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension.
- Slovakia should resume sending state military aid to Ukraine.
- The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto.
- The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law.
- Sales of new petrol and diesel cars should be banned from 2035.
Which parties are closest to Právo na pravdu?
On the test statements, Právo na pravdu is closest to SNS (82% agreement) and furthest from PS (40%).
Where do these positions come from?
Of the 42 positions, 28 are based on a document (manifesto, National Council vote or public statement) linked next to each statement; 14 are estimates. Last reviewed 16/10/2026.
How well do you match Právo na pravdu?
Don't stay in doubt: take the test and find out your real match percentage with Právo na pravdu and with all the other parties, topic by topic.
Take the political test