⚖️ Issue
Rule of law and democracy: what each party thinks
5 questions, 60 party positions and 5 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their manifestos, votes and statements. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”
Disagrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”
In between: “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Agrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”
Disagrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”; “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Agrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”
Disagrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”; “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Agrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”; “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Disagrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”
Agrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”
Disagrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”; “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Agrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”
Disagrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”; “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Agrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”; “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Disagrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”
Agrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”; “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Disagrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”
Agrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”
Disagrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”
In between: “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Agrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”
Disagrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”; “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Agrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”; “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”
Disagrees: “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
In between: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”
Agrees: “Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight”; “A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part”
Disagrees: “Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption”; “The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363)”
In between: “The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament”
Slovakia should re-establish the Office of the Special Prosecutor to fight corruption.
The Office of the Special Prosecutor handled serious corruption and organised crime. A reform of the Criminal Code abolished it on 20 March 2024, and its cases passed to the regional prosecutor's offices and the Prosecutor General's Office. In the July 2026 referendum, invalid because of low turnout (16.13%), 92% voted to restore it.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 6 in favour, 1 in between and 5 against.
-
Smer Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 106 (novela Trestného zákona), 8. 2. 2024 Why
-
PS Strongly in favourKladivo na korupciu (progresivne.sk), aktualizované 11. 3. 2026 Why
-
Hlas Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 106 (novela Trestného zákona), 8. 2. 2024 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko Strongly in favourHnutie SLOVENSKO, aktualita, 20. 4. 2026: Otázky referenda presadíme ako podmienky vstupu do vlády Why
-
KDH In favourSITA, 13. 2. 2025: Kresťanskí demokrati predstavili návrhy na ústavné zmeny, chcú posilniť suverenitu Slovenska Why
-
SaS Strongly in favourReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 6, priorita 1 a opatrenia 3 a 5 Why
-
SNS Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 106 (novela Trestného zákona), 8. 2. 2024 Why
-
Republika Strongly againstProgram pre právo a spravodlivosť (web hnutia, program 2023, aktualizované 22. 5. 2026) Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In favourHeringes Walter: Nélkülünk nem megy!, szovetseg.sk, 25. 11. 2025; vyhlásenie Republikovej rady, 20. 6. 2026 Why
-
Demokrati Strongly in favourHlboká orba (programová línia schválená Republikovou radou 2. 8. 2025) Why
-
Sme rodina In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Právo na pravdu Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
Non-governmental organisations funded from abroad should be subject to stricter state oversight.
In April 2025 parliament passed a law requiring NGOs with annual income above €35,000 to publish the names of donors giving more than €5,000. The Constitutional Court ruled it unconstitutional in December 2025, and it has not applied since February 2026.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 6 in favour, 0 in between and 6 against.
-
Smer Strongly in favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 245 (zákon o mimovládnych neziskových organizáciách), 16. 4. 2025 Why
-
PS Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 245, 16. 4. 2025 Why
-
Hlas Strongly in favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 245 (zákon o mimovládnych neziskových organizáciách), 16. 4. 2025 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 245 (zákon o mimovládnych neziskových organizáciách), 16. 4. 2025 Why
-
KDH Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 245 (zákon o mimovládnych neziskových organizáciách), 16. 4. 2025 Why
-
SaS Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 245 (zákon o mimovládnych neziskových organizáciách), 16. 4. 2025 Why
-
SNS Strongly in favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 245 (zákon o mimovládnych neziskových organizáciách), 16. 4. 2025 Why
-
Republika Strongly in favourProgram pre právo a spravodlivosť (web hnutia, program 2023, aktualizované 22. 5. 2026) Why
-
Maďarská aliancia AgainstVyhlásenie Republikovej rady (Az Országos Tanács nyilatkozata), szovetseg.sk, 6. 4. 2025 Why
-
Demokrati Strongly againstDemokrati: Vláda pripravila kladivo na mimovládky (tlačová správa), 15. 4. 2025 Why
-
Sme rodina In favour
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Právo na pravdu Strongly in favourProgramové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 8 Why
The Prosecutor General should keep the power to annul final decisions by the police and prosecutors (the so-called Section 363).
Under Section 363 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Prosecutor General annuls a final decision by a police officer or prosecutor in the pre-trial stage if he finds that the law was broken. He can do so within six months, and his decision cannot be appealed. This covers, for example, decisions to charge someone.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 5 in favour, 0 in between and 7 against.
-
Smer Strongly in favourSMER – SD, web strany, 22. 6. 2023: Prezidentka a vládni poslanci útočia na § 363 Why
-
PS Strongly againstProgram pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Spravodlivosť Why
-
Hlas In favourProgramové vyhlásenie vlády SR 2023-2027 (dôvera NR SR 21. 11. 2023), s. 66-67 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko AgainstVolebný program OĽANO 2023 „Ty rozhodneš“, s. 21 PDF (A.3 Spravodlivosť, opatrenie 18) Why
-
KDH AgainstVolebný program KDH 2023, s. 115 Why
-
SaS Strongly againstReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 6, opatrenie 6 Why
-
SNS In favourProgramové vyhlásenie vlády SR 2023 – 2027 (dôvera NR SR 21. 11. 2023), s. 67 Why
-
Republika In favourDenník REPUBLIKA, 18. 5. 2023: Ivana Slivková (REPUBLIKA): Brázda proti (ne)spravodlivosti (archív web.archive.org) Why
-
Maďarská aliancia AgainstVolebný program Aliancie 2023, časť Korrupcióellenesség, jogállam (archív Wayback) Why
-
Demokrati Strongly againstHlboká orba (programová línia schválená Republikovou radou 2. 8. 2025) Why
-
Sme rodina In favourSITA, 1. 1. 2022 (rozhovor s predsedom hnutia) Why
-
Právo na pravdu AgainstStanovisko predsedu strany Zoroslava Kollára k zriadeniu štátneho zastupiteľstva, 9. 2. 2026 Why
The management of the public broadcaster STVR should be chosen by an independent body, not by the government or the governing majority in parliament.
Since 2024 the public broadcaster has been called STVR (previously RTVS). Its director general is elected by a nine-member council: four members are appointed by the culture minister and five are elected by parliament by a majority of MPs present.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 7 in favour, 1 in between and 4 against.
-
Smer Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 278 (zákon o Slovenskej televízii a rozhlase), 20. 6. 2024 Why
-
PS Strongly in favourProgram pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Kultúra Why
-
Hlas Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 278 (zákon o Slovenskej televízii a rozhlase), 20. 6. 2024 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In favourVolebný program OĽANO 2023 „Ty rozhodneš“, s. 63-64 PDF (B.16 Kultúra a médiá, opatrenie 13) Why
-
KDH In favourTASR (teraz.sk), 24. 4. 2024: KDH: Zmeny v RTVS znamenajú násilné ovládnutie média úzkou skupinou Why
-
SaS Strongly in favourReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 15, opatrenie 4 Why
-
SNS Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 278 (zákon o Slovenskej televízii a rozhlase), 20. 6. 2024 Why
-
Republika Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Maďarská aliancia In favourPS a Maďarská aliancia budú hľadať spoločný postup v kľúčových témach, madarska-aliancia.sk, 27. 5. 2026 Why
-
Demokrati In favourDemokrati, smedemokrati.sk: Naše riešenia pre Slovensko, bod 5 (stav k 15. 10. 2026); Hlboká orba (2. 8. 2025) Why
-
Sme rodina In favourProgram pomoci rodinám 2020, s. 124 (Kultúra – Verejnoprávne médiá) Why
-
Právo na pravdu In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
A referendum should be valid even if fewer than half of eligible voters take part.
Under the Constitution, a referendum is only valid if more than half of eligible voters take part. The last referendum, on 4 July 2026, was invalid: turnout was 16.13%.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 4 in favour, 2 in between and 6 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Smer | In between | Estimated position Why |
| PS | Against | Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why |
| Hlas | Against | HLAS – tlačová správa, 24. 8. 2026: Občania majú mať právo skrátiť volebné obdobie parlamentu Why |
| Hnutie Slovensko | In favour | Volebný program OĽANO 2023 „Ty rozhodneš“, s. 33 PDF (A.7 Priama demokracia, opatrenie 1) Why |
| KDH | Against | Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why |
| SaS | Against | Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why |
| SNS | In favour | Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why |
| Republika | Strongly in favour | Program pre právo a spravodlivosť (web hnutia, program 2023, aktualizované 22. 5. 2026) Why |
| Maďarská aliancia | In between | Estimated position Why |
| Demokrati | Strongly against | Volebný program 2023 (Plán pomoci ľuďom), s. 36 Why |
| Sme rodina | Against | Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany; Program pomoci rodinám 2020, s. 126 Why |
| Právo na pravdu | In favour | Tlačová správa strany Právo na pravdu, 4. 7. 2026 Why |
-
Smer In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PS AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Hlas AgainstHLAS – tlačová správa, 24. 8. 2026: Občania majú mať právo skrátiť volebné obdobie parlamentu Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In favourVolebný program OĽANO 2023 „Ty rozhodneš“, s. 33 PDF (A.7 Priama demokracia, opatrenie 1) Why
-
KDH AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
SaS AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
SNS In favourVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Republika Strongly in favourProgram pre právo a spravodlivosť (web hnutia, program 2023, aktualizované 22. 5. 2026) Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Demokrati Strongly againstVolebný program 2023 (Plán pomoci ľuďom), s. 36 Why
-
Sme rodina AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany; Program pomoci rodinám 2020, s. 126 Why
-
Právo na pravdu In favourTlačová správa strany Právo na pravdu, 4. 7. 2026 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 5 of them the parties hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test