🤝 Issue
Values and society: what each party thinks
4 questions, 48 party positions and 2 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their manifestos, votes and statements. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”
Disagrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”; “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”
In between: “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Agrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”
Disagrees: “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”; “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”; “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Agrees: “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”; “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Disagrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”; “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”
Agrees: “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”
Disagrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”
In between: “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”; “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Agrees: “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”; “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”; “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Disagrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”
Agrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”
Disagrees: “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”; “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”; “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Agrees: “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”; “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Disagrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”
In between: “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”
Agrees: “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”; “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”; “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Disagrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”
Agrees: “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”; “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Disagrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”
In between: “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”
Disagrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”; “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”; “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”; “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Agrees: “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”
Disagrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”; “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”
In between: “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Agrees: “Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU”; “Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence”
Disagrees: “Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally”
In between: “Abortion should be more restricted than it is now”
Same-sex couples should be able to register their partnership legally.
Slovakia currently has no registered partnership, and the Constitution defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. In a Focus poll in February 2024, 51% supported registered partnerships and 45% were against.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favour, 0 in between and 10 against.
-
Smer Strongly againstNoviny.sk, 28. 5. 2026: Fico vyzýva na ďalšiu zmenu ústavy, chce zabrániť uznaniu homosexuálnych manželstiev Why
-
PS Strongly in favourProgram pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Rovnosť Why
-
Hlas AgainstProgramové vyhlásenie vlády SR 2023-2027 (dôvera NR SR 21. 11. 2023), s. 68 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko Strongly againstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
KDH Strongly againstVolebný kompas 2023 (UMB a EUI), autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 11 Why
-
SaS Strongly in favourReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 6, opatrenie 32 Why
-
SNS Strongly againstSNS, sns.sk (archív Wayback), 29. 9. 2025: Ústava SR bude chrániť normálny život na Slovensku Why
-
Republika Strongly againstNaše názory a postoje (web hnutia, aktualizované 13. 5. 2026), Ochrana tradičných hodnôt Why
-
Maďarská aliancia AgainstProgramové tézy Aliancie pre voľby do EP 2024 (archív Wayback) Why
-
Demokrati AgainstDemokrati: Eduard Heger: Na zníženie trestov za marihuanu už dozrel čas, na registrované partnerstvá ešte nie (rozhovor), 2023 Why
-
Sme rodina Strongly againstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany; Program pomoci rodinám 2020, s. 9 Why
-
Právo na pravdu Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
Abortion should be more restricted than it is now.
Abortion is currently available at the woman's request up to the 12th week of pregnancy, and later only on health grounds. At least 48 hours must pass between the mandatory information given to the woman and the procedure.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favour, 4 in between and 6 against.
-
Smer AgainstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1369 (novela zákona o umelom prerušení tehotenstva, M. Čepček), 14. 2. 2023 Why
-
PS Strongly againstProgram pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Rovnosť Why
-
Hlas AgainstHLAS – tlačová správa, 11. 11. 2021: Neschválenie zmeny interrupcií nech je apelom na vládnu koalíciu Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In betweenHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1369 (novela zákona o umelom prerušení tehotenstva, M. Čepček), 14. 2. 2023 Why
-
KDH In favourVolebný program KDH 2023, s. 88 Why
-
SaS Strongly againstEU&I (euandi) 2024, autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 9 Why
-
SNS In betweenSITA, 20. 1. 2023: Danko nie je zástanca „tvrdého“ zákona o interrupciách ako v Poľsku Why
-
Republika In favourEU&I (euandi) 2024, autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 9 Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In betweenPravda: László Gubík už vzhliada k vláde s dnešnou opozíciou, 7. 5. 2026 (príspevok na Facebooku) Why
-
Demokrati AgainstEU&I (euandi) 2024, autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 9 Why
-
Sme rodina AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Právo na pravdu In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
Ethical issues such as marriage or adoption should be decided only by each country, not by the EU.
The constitutional amendment of September 2025 states that Slovakia retains sovereignty over fundamental cultural and ethical questions, such as the protection of life, marriage, the family, culture and language, and that nothing in the Constitution means consent to transferring these powers.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 9 in favour, 0 in between and 3 against.
-
Smer Strongly in favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 733 (novela Ústavy SR), 26. 9. 2025 Why
-
PS AgainstNoviny.sk (TV JOJ), 27. 9. 2025 Why
-
Hlas Strongly in favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 733 (novela Ústavy SR), 26. 9. 2025 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In favourBudúcnosť je bezpečná Európa (volebný program do EP 2024), s. 13 Why
-
KDH Strongly in favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 733 (novela Ústavy SR), 26. 9. 2025 Why
-
SaS Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 733 (novela Ústavy SR), 26. 9. 2025 Why
-
SNS Strongly in favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 733 (novela Ústavy SR), 26. 9. 2025 Why
-
Republika In favourProgram hnutia, „Náš postoj k aktuálnym témam“ (web, aktualizované 13. 5. 2026); web hnutia, 24. 6. 2021 Why
-
Maďarská aliancia Strongly in favourProgramové tézy Aliancie pre voľby do EP 2024, časť Megosztó ideológiai témák (archív Wayback) Why
-
Demokrati AgainstDemokrati: Schválenie zmien v ústave je bianko šek pre Fica (tlačová správa), 16. 6. 2025; Stanovisko k novele ústavy, 26. 9. 2025 Why
-
Sme rodina In favourProgram pomoci rodinám 2020, s. 116; Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Právo na pravdu Strongly in favourProgramové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 5 Why
Possessing a small amount of cannabis for personal use should remain a criminal offence.
Possessing cannabis is currently a criminal offence: a very small amount carries up to one year in prison, and a small amount from six months to three years.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 6 in favour, 3 in between and 3 against.
-
Smer In betweenNoviny.sk, 23. 12. 2023: Minister spravodlivosti avizuje nižšie tresty za drogy Why
-
PS Strongly againstProgram pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Spravodlivosť Why
-
Hlas In favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 106 (novela Trestného zákona), 8. 2. 2024 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In betweenVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
KDH In favourVolebný kompas 2023 (UMB a EUI), autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 12 Why
-
SaS Strongly againstReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 6, opatrenie 13 Why
-
SNS In favourVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit, eurovoľby 2024, odpoveď strany Why
-
Republika In favourNaše názory a postoje (web hnutia, aktualizované 13. 5. 2026), Ochrana tradičných hodnôt; EU&I 2024, výrok 8 Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In favour
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Demokrati AgainstVolebný kompas 2023 (UMB a EUI), autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 12; Volebný program 2023, s. 19 Why
-
Sme rodina In betweenVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Právo na pravdu In favour
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 2 of them the parties hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test