🗣️ Issue
Minorities: what each party thinks
4 questions, 48 party positions and 2 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their manifestos, votes and statements. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Disagrees: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”; “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”; “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”
In between: “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
Agrees: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”; “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”; “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”; “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
Agrees: “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
Disagrees: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”; “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”
In between: “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”
Agrees: “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”; “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”; “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
In between: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”
Agrees: “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”; “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
Disagrees: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”
In between: “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”
Agrees: “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”; “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”; “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
In between: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”
Disagrees: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”; “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”; “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”
In between: “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
Disagrees: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”; “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”; “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
In between: “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”
Agrees: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”; “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”; “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”; “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
Agrees: “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”; “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
In between: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”; “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”
Disagrees: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”; “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”; “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”
In between: “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
Disagrees: “In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak”; “The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed”; “The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing”
In between: “People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship”
In municipalities with a large Hungarian population, Hungarian should be an official language alongside Slovak.
Slovak is the state language. In municipalities where a minority makes up at least 15% of the population in two consecutive censuses, its members can use their language in dealings with the authorities, for example in written submissions and replies. According to the 2021 census, 8.5% of the population has Hungarian as their mother tongue.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favour, 3 in between and 7 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Smer | Against | Návrat dôstojnosti do života ľudí (volebný program 2023), s. 6 Why |
| PS | In favour | Program pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Národnostné menšiny Why |
| Hlas | Against | Estimated position Why |
| Hnutie Slovensko | In between | Estimated position Why |
| KDH | Against | Estimated position Why |
| SaS | In between | Reštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 6, ďalšie opatrenia (zákon o postavení národnostných menšín) Why |
| SNS | Strongly against | Noviny.sk, 11. 11. 2024: SNS hovorí o potrebe zlepšiť dodržiavanie jazykových pravidiel Why |
| Republika | Against | Program pre kultúru a médiá; Program pre školstvo, vedu, výskum a šport (web hnutia, program 2023) Why |
| Maďarská aliancia | Strongly in favour | Programunk: A magyarok 13 pontja (Košice, 2025), bod 4 – szovetseg.sk Why |
| Demokrati | In between | Volebný kompas 2023 (UMB a EUI), autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 39; Volebný program 2023, s. 34 Why |
| Sme rodina | Against | Estimated position Why |
| Právo na pravdu | Against | Estimated position Why |
-
Smer AgainstNávrat dôstojnosti do života ľudí (volebný program 2023), s. 6 Why
-
PS In favourProgram pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Národnostné menšiny Why
-
Hlas Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Hnutie Slovensko In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
KDH Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
SaS In betweenReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 6, ďalšie opatrenia (zákon o postavení národnostných menšín) Why
-
SNS Strongly againstNoviny.sk, 11. 11. 2024: SNS hovorí o potrebe zlepšiť dodržiavanie jazykových pravidiel Why
-
Republika AgainstProgram pre kultúru a médiá; Program pre školstvo, vedu, výskum a šport (web hnutia, program 2023) Why
-
Maďarská aliancia Strongly in favourProgramunk: A magyarok 13 pontja (Košice, 2025), bod 4 – szovetseg.sk Why
-
Demokrati In betweenVolebný kompas 2023 (UMB a EUI), autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 39; Volebný program 2023, s. 34 Why
-
Sme rodina Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Právo na pravdu Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
The 2025 law that makes it a crime to question the Beneš decrees should be repealed.
Since December 2025 the Criminal Code has punished with up to six months in prison publicly denying or questioning the post-war settlement based on legal acts of the Czechoslovak Republic or the Slovak National Council. These acts include the 1945 Beneš decrees, under which most Hungarians and Germans lost their citizenship and property.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 4 in favour, 3 in between and 5 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Smer | Strongly against | Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115 (novela Trestného zákona), 11. 12. 2025 Why |
| PS | In favour | Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115, 11. 12. 2025 Why |
| Hlas | Strongly against | HLAS – tlačová správa, 25. 11. 2025: Progresívne Slovensko otvára Pandorinu skrinku Why |
| Hnutie Slovensko | In favour | Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115 (novela Trestného zákona), 11. 12. 2025 Why |
| KDH | In between | Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115 (novela Trestného zákona), 11. 12. 2025 Why |
| SaS | In favour | Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115, 11. 12. 2025 Why |
| SNS | Strongly against | Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115 (novela Trestného zákona), 11. 12. 2025 Why |
| Republika | In between | Estimated position Why |
| Maďarská aliancia | Strongly in favour | László Gubík: V otázke Benešových dekrétov… neexistuje kompromis, madarska-aliancia.sk, 21. 4. 2026 Why |
| Demokrati | In between | Estimated position Why |
| Sme rodina | Against | Estimated position Why |
| Právo na pravdu | Against | Estimated position Why |
-
Smer Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115 (novela Trestného zákona), 11. 12. 2025 Why
-
PS In favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115, 11. 12. 2025 Why
-
Hlas Strongly againstHLAS – tlačová správa, 25. 11. 2025: Progresívne Slovensko otvára Pandorinu skrinku Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115 (novela Trestného zákona), 11. 12. 2025 Why
-
KDH In betweenHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115 (novela Trestného zákona), 11. 12. 2025 Why
-
SaS In favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115, 11. 12. 2025 Why
-
SNS Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1115 (novela Trestného zákona), 11. 12. 2025 Why
-
Republika In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Maďarská aliancia Strongly in favourLászló Gubík: V otázke Benešových dekrétov… neexistuje kompromis, madarska-aliancia.sk, 21. 4. 2026 Why
-
Demokrati In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Sme rodina Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Právo na pravdu Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
People who acquire another country's citizenship should be able to keep their Slovak citizenship.
Today, anyone who voluntarily acquires another citizenship loses their Slovak one. The exceptions are acquiring it through marriage, birth or as a child, or after living in that country for at least five years.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 6 in favour, 2 in between and 4 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Smer | Against | Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 440 (novela zákona o štátnom občianstve), 16. 2. 2022 Why |
| PS | In favour | Program pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Národnostné menšiny Why |
| Hlas | In between | Estimated position Why |
| Hnutie Slovensko | In favour | Volebný program OĽANO 2023 „Ty rozhodneš“, s. 85-86 PDF (C.22 Slováci v zahraničí) Why |
| KDH | In favour | Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why |
| SaS | Strongly in favour | Program pre národnostné menšiny (2023), s. 10 PDF Why |
| SNS | Against | Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why |
| Republika | Against | Estimated position Why |
| Maďarská aliancia | Strongly in favour | Volebný program Aliancie 2023, časť Kisebbségi ügyek (archív Wayback) Why |
| Demokrati | In favour | Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why |
| Sme rodina | Against | Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why |
| Právo na pravdu | In between | Estimated position Why |
-
Smer AgainstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 440 (novela zákona o štátnom občianstve), 16. 2. 2022 Why
-
PS In favourProgram pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Národnostné menšiny Why
-
Hlas In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Hnutie Slovensko In favourVolebný program OĽANO 2023 „Ty rozhodneš“, s. 85-86 PDF (C.22 Slováci v zahraničí) Why
-
KDH In favourVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
SaS Strongly in favourProgram pre národnostné menšiny (2023), s. 10 PDF Why
-
SNS AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Republika Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Maďarská aliancia Strongly in favourVolebný program Aliancie 2023, časť Kisebbségi ügyek (archív Wayback) Why
-
Demokrati In favourVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Sme rodina AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Právo na pravdu In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
The state should invest more in integrating marginalised Roma communities, for example in pre-school education and housing.
According to the 2019 Atlas of Roma Communities, about 405,000 people in Slovakia live in 949 places with concentrations of marginalised Roma communities. Integration covers areas such as pre-school education, housing, health and work.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 7 in favour, 3 in between and 2 against.
-
Smer In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
PS Strongly in favourProgram pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Sociálna politika Why
-
Hlas In favourHLAS – tlačová správa, 22. 10. 2025: HLAS presadil zásadnú reformu školstva Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko Strongly in favourVolebný program OĽANO 2023 „Ty rozhodneš“, s. 59 PDF (B.14 Rómska problematika) Why
-
KDH Strongly in favourVolebný program KDH 2023, s. 61 a 98-99 Why
-
SaS In favourReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 2, priorita 3 a opatrenia 32 – 39 Why
-
SNS In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Republika AgainstWeb hnutia Republika, 23. 9. 2025: Miliarda do osád v čase uťahovania opaskov slušných ľudí Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In favourEgyüttélés 2040, kap. V (Programunk, szovetseg.sk); Vyhlásenie Republikovej rady, 22. 3. 2026 Why
-
Demokrati Strongly in favourVolebný program 2023 (Plán pomoci ľuďom), s. 34-35 Why
-
Sme rodina In betweenProgram pomoci rodinám 2020, s. 27 a 125 Why
-
Právo na pravdu AgainstTlačová správa strany Právo na pravdu, 25. 9. 2026 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 2 of them the parties hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test