🇪🇺 Issue
European Union: what each party thinks
3 questions, 36 party positions and 2 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their manifestos, votes and statements. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”; “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Agrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Disagrees: “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”; “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Agrees: “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”; “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”; “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”; “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Agrees: “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”; “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Agrees: “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”; “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
Disagrees: “The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto”; “If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it”; “The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law”
The EU should be able to decide foreign policy by majority vote, without any single country having a veto.
Most EU foreign policy decisions, such as sanctions, currently require unanimity, so any member state can block them. Switching to majority voting would also need the agreement of every member state.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 1 in favour, 0 in between and 11 against.
-
Smer Strongly againstZa mier v Európe! (program do volieb do EP 2024), s. 2 Why
-
PS In favourProgram pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Európska a zahraničná politika Why
-
Hlas Strongly againstRezortný program HLAS 2023, s. 18 (Európska a zahraničná politika) Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko AgainstBudúcnosť je bezpečná Európa (volebný program do EP 2024), s. 12 Why
-
KDH Strongly againstVolebný program KDH pre voľby do EP 2024, bod 1 (kdh.sk/eurovolby-program) Why
-
SaS AgainstVolebný program do Európskeho parlamentu 2024 „EÚ áno“, s. 35-36 Why
-
SNS Strongly againstSNS, sns.sk (archív Wayback), 2. 4. 2026: Právo veta = stop experimentom bruselských pomätencov Why
-
Republika Strongly againstWeb hnutia Republika, 22. 11. 2023: Šialené! Odhlasované! EÚ sa má zmeniť na vojenskú federáciu; EU&I 2024, výrok 28 Why
-
Maďarská aliancia Strongly againstProgramové tézy Aliancie pre voľby do EP 2024, časť Vissza a konszenzuális döntéshozatalhoz (archív Wayback) Why
-
Demokrati AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit, eurovoľby 2024, odpoveď strany Why
-
Sme rodina AgainstProgram pomoci rodinám 2020, s. 114 a 116 (Medzinárodné vzťahy) Why
-
Právo na pravdu Strongly againstProgramové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 5 Why
If the EU does not change fundamentally, Slovakia should hold a referendum on whether to stay in it.
In Slovakia a referendum is only valid if more than half of eligible voters take part. In autumn 2024, according to the Eurobarometer, 19% of Slovaks would leave the EU if nothing changes and 9% would leave now; 55% want reforms but would stay.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 1 in favour, 0 in between and 11 against.
-
Smer Strongly againstNávrat suverenity do slovenskej zahraničnej politiky (volebný program 2023), s. 1 Why
-
PS Strongly againstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Hlas Strongly againstDeklarácia HLAS – Hodnotové princípy povolebnej spolupráce (snem v Púchove, 10. 5. 2023), s. 1 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko Strongly againstTASR (teraz.sk), 18. 1. 2025: Hnutie Slovensko: Výroky T. Gašpara sú nebezpečné pre Slovensko Why
-
KDH Strongly againstUznesenie z 31. snemu KDH, Ružomberok, 7. 3. 2026, príloha č. 1 Why
-
SaS Strongly againstReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 6, opatrenie 1 Why
-
SNS AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Republika Strongly in favourProgram pre zahraničnú politiku (web hnutia, program 2023, aktualizované 13. 5. 2026) Why
-
Maďarská aliancia Strongly againstProgramové tézy Aliancie pre voľby do EP 2024 (archív Wayback) Why
-
Demokrati Strongly againstVolebný program 2023 (Plán pomoci ľuďom), s. 5 Why
-
Sme rodina AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany; Program pomoci rodinám 2020, s. 114 Why
-
Právo na pravdu AgainstProgramové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 5 Why
The EU should be able to freeze EU funds for countries that do not respect the rule of law.
Since 2021 an EU regulation has allowed EU funds to be suspended for a country when breaches of the rule of law put the EU budget at risk. It was first used against Hungary in 2022.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 3 in favour, 0 in between and 9 against.
-
Smer Strongly againstZa mier v Európe! (program do volieb do EP 2024), s. 4 Why
-
PS Strongly in favourVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit, eurovoľby 2024, odpoveď strany Why
-
Hlas Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Hnutie Slovensko In favourTASR, 16. 2. 2022: Bilčík víta verdikt Súdneho dvora EÚ o režime podmienenosti (vyjadrenie P. Polláka, OĽaNO) Why
-
KDH AgainstVolebný program KDH pre voľby do EP 2024, bod 1 (kdh.sk/eurovolby-program) Why
-
SaS AgainstVolebný program do Európskeho parlamentu 2024 „EÚ áno“, s. 61 Why
-
SNS AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit, eurovoľby 2024, odpoveď strany Why
-
Republika Strongly againstEU&I (euandi) 2024, autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 29 Why
-
Maďarská aliancia AgainstProgramové tézy Aliancie pre voľby do EP 2024 (archív Wayback) Why
-
Demokrati Strongly in favourVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit, eurovoľby 2024, odpoveď strany Why
-
Sme rodina Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Právo na pravdu Strongly againstProgramové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 5 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 2 of them the parties hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test