💰 Issue
Economy and taxes: what each party thinks
4 questions, 48 party positions and 2 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their manifestos, votes and statements. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”
Disagrees: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”; “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”; “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
Agrees: “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”
Disagrees: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”; “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
In between: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”
Agrees: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”
Disagrees: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”; “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”; “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
Agrees: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”; “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”
Disagrees: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”
In between: “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
Agrees: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”; “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”
In between: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”; “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
Agrees: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”; “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”; “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
Disagrees: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”
Agrees: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”
Disagrees: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”; “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
In between: “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”
Agrees: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”; “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”
Disagrees: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”
In between: “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
Agrees: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”; “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”
Disagrees: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”
In between: “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
Agrees: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”; “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”; “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
Disagrees: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”
Agrees: “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”
In between: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”; “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”; “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
Agrees: “The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes”
Disagrees: “The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money”
In between: “Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn”; “Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax”
Everyone should pay the same rate of income tax, whatever they earn.
Personal income tax is currently progressive: since 2026 it has four rates, of 19%, 25%, 30% and 35%. From 2004 to 2012 everyone paid a single flat rate of 19%.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 3 in favour, 2 in between and 7 against.
| Party | Position | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Smer | Strongly against | Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1005 (konsolidácia verejných financií), 24. 9. 2025 Why |
| PS | Against | Estimated position Why |
| Hlas | Strongly against | Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1005 (konsolidácia verejných financií), 24. 9. 2025 Why |
| Hnutie Slovensko | Against | Estimated position Why |
| KDH | Strongly in favour | Volebný program KDH 2023, s. 13-14 Why |
| SaS | Strongly in favour | Reštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 1, opatrenie 29 Why |
| SNS | Against | Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1005 (konsolidácia verejných financií), 24. 9. 2025 Why |
| Republika | Strongly against | Program pre financie a rozpočet (web hnutia, program 2023, aktualizované 13. 5. 2026) Why |
| Maďarská aliancia | Against | Estimated position Why |
| Demokrati | Strongly in favour | Demokrati: Demokrati chcú zaviesť 17% rovnú daň a zjednodušiť podnikanie (tlačová správa), 9. 1. 2026 Why |
| Sme rodina | In between | Estimated position Why |
| Právo na pravdu | In between | Estimated position Why |
-
Smer Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1005 (konsolidácia verejných financií), 24. 9. 2025 Why
-
PS Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Hlas Strongly againstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1005 (konsolidácia verejných financií), 24. 9. 2025 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
KDH Strongly in favourVolebný program KDH 2023, s. 13-14 Why
-
SaS Strongly in favourReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 1, opatrenie 29 Why
-
SNS AgainstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1005 (konsolidácia verejných financií), 24. 9. 2025 Why
-
Republika Strongly againstProgram pre financie a rozpočet (web hnutia, program 2023, aktualizované 13. 5. 2026) Why
-
Maďarská aliancia Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Demokrati Strongly in favourDemokrati: Demokrati chcú zaviesť 17% rovnú daň a zjednodušiť podnikanie (tlačová správa), 9. 1. 2026 Why
-
Sme rodina In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Právo na pravdu In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
Banks, energy companies and large retail chains should pay a special tax.
On top of corporate tax, banks, energy companies and other regulated sectors such as telecoms already pay a special levy on their profits (Act No. 235/2012). Retail chains are not among these sectors.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 7 in favour, 3 in between and 2 against.
-
Smer In favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 97 (Lex konsolidácia), 19. 12. 2023 Why
-
PS In betweenTASR (teraz.sk), 12. 8. 2023 Why
-
Hlas In favourTASR (teraz.sk), 12. 8. 2023: Bankový odvod nevylučuje po voľbách väčšina strán Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In favourZmluva so Slovenskom, 10. 9. 2023, bod 4 Why
-
KDH In betweenVolebný kompas 2023 (UMB a EUI), autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 5 Why
-
SaS Strongly againstReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 1, opatrenie 22 Why
-
SNS Strongly in favourSNS, vyhlásenie k štátnemu rozpočtu (sns.sk), 29. 9. 2026 Why
-
Republika In favourProgram pre financie a rozpočet (web hnutia, program 2023, aktualizované 13. 5. 2026) Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In favourEgyüttélés 2040, kap. II (Programunk, szovetseg.sk) Why
-
Demokrati AgainstDemokrati: Vláda nielen že ceny potravín neznížila… (tlačová správa), 19. 8. 2024; Volebný program 2023, s. 63 Why
-
Sme rodina In favourPetícia proti progresívnym sociálnym experimentom (web hnutia, 2023); Program pomoci rodinám 2020, s. 63-64 Why
-
Právo na pravdu In betweenProgramové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 11 Why
The deficit should be reduced by cutting state spending rather than by raising taxes.
The public deficit was 4.45% of GDP in 2025, above the 3% limit set by EU rules. Since 2025 the standard VAT rate has been 23% instead of 20%, and since 2026 income tax has new rates of 30% and 35%.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 8 in favour, 2 in between and 2 against.
-
Smer AgainstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 483 (konsolidácia), 3. 10. 2024 Why
-
PS In favourTRESK! Totálny reštart ekonomiky Slovenska (2025), s. 30-31 PDF Why
-
Hlas AgainstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 1005 (konsolidácia verejných financií), 24. 9. 2025 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In favourVolebný program OĽANO 2023 „Ty rozhodneš“, s. 96 PDF (D.24 Zodpovedné hospodárenie štátu) Why
-
KDH In favourVolebný kompas 2023 (UMB a EUI), autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 1 Why
-
SaS Strongly in favourReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 1, opatrenia 1 a 2 Why
-
SNS In betweenSITA, 7. 9. 2025: Danko chce novú daň pre obchodné reťazce Why
-
Republika In favourWeb hnutia Republika, 7. 5. 2025: Aká konsolidácia? Vláda dáva ďalších 700-tisíc eur progresívnym mimovládkam! Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In favourMegkezdte a munkát a Magyar Szövetség új elnöksége, szovetseg.sk, 4. 10. 2024 Why
-
Demokrati In favourDemokrati: Zrušenie transakčnej dane je vítaná vec (tlačová správa), 25. 8. 2026; Vyššia DPH nie je cesta, 14. 8. 2025 Why
-
Sme rodina In betweenTASR, 25. 3. 2026; web hnutia (úvodná stránka), 2026 Why
-
Právo na pravdu Strongly in favourTlačová správa strany Právo na pravdu, 24. 8. 2026 Why
The standard VAT rate should be cut from 23%, even if the state collects less money.
The standard VAT rate rose from 20% to 23% on 1 January 2025. Reduced rates of 19% and 5% apply to certain goods and services.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 2 in favour, 5 in between and 5 against.
-
Smer AgainstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 483 (konsolidácia, DPH 23 %), 3. 10. 2024 Why
-
PS AgainstTRESK! Totálny reštart ekonomiky Slovenska (2025), s. 29-30 PDF Why
-
Hlas AgainstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 483 (konsolidácia verejných financií), 3. 10. 2024 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In betweenHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 483 (konsolidácia verejných financií), 3. 10. 2024 Why
-
KDH In betweenHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 483 (konsolidácia verejných financií), 3. 10. 2024 Why
-
SaS Strongly in favourReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 1, opatrenie 16 Why
-
SNS AgainstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 483 (konsolidácia, DPH 23 %), 3. 10. 2024 Why
-
Republika In betweenWeb hnutia Republika, 3. 10. 2024: So schváleným masívnym zvyšovaním daní nesúhlasíme! Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In betweenMegkezdte a munkát a Magyar Szövetség új elnöksége, szovetseg.sk, 4. 10. 2024 Why
-
Demokrati Strongly in favourHlboká orba (programová línia schválená Republikovou radou 2. 8. 2025) Why
-
Sme rodina In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Právo na pravdu AgainstTlačová správa OZ Právo na pravdu, 28. 8. 2025 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 2 of them the parties hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test