👵 Issue
Pensions and benefits: what each party thinks
4 questions, 48 party positions and 2 complete disagreements (how they are assigned).
What each party proposes on this issue
A summary of their positions on the questions in this issue, based on their manifestos, votes and statements. Details and sources, question by question, below.
Agrees: “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”; “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Disagrees: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”
Agrees: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”
Disagrees: “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”; “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Agrees: “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”; “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Disagrees: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”
Agrees: “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”; “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”
Disagrees: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Agrees: “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”
Disagrees: “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”
In between: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Agrees: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”
Disagrees: “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”
In between: “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Agrees: “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”; “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Disagrees: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”
Agrees: “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Disagrees: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”
In between: “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”
Agrees: “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
In between: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”; “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”
Agrees: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”
Disagrees: “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”
In between: “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Agrees: “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”; “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”; “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Disagrees: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”
Agrees: “People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training”
Disagrees: “Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension”; “The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap”; “Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them”
Only people with low pensions should receive the 13th pension.
Today the 13th pension is paid every December to everyone receiving an old-age, disability, survivor's or social pension. It equals the average amount of that type of pension in the previous year, with a minimum of €300.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 3 in favour, 2 in between and 7 against.
-
Smer Strongly againstNávrat dôstojnosti do života ľudí (volebný program 2023), s. 4 Why
-
PS In favourTASR, 3. 5. 2026 Why
-
Hlas Strongly againstHLAS – tlačová správa, 30. 6. 2026: Prinášame opatrenia na zvýšenie kočíkovného… Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko AgainstStartitup, 16. 4. 2025: Matovič predstavil „utajované materiály“ ministerstva financií Why
-
KDH In betweenTASR (teraz.sk), 12. 5. 2024: Tomáš hovorí o spravodlivých 13. dôchodkoch, Majerskému chýba adresnosť Why
-
SaS Strongly in favourReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 2, opatrenie 11 Why
-
SNS AgainstNoviny.sk, 4. 5. 2026: Siahne vláda na 13. dôchodky a zdaní veľké firmy? Danko priblížil možné opatrenia Why
-
Republika Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Maďarská aliancia In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Demokrati In favour
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Sme rodina AgainstPetícia proti progresívnym sociálnym experimentom (2023); Normálne noviny (september 2023), s. 3 Why
-
Právo na pravdu Strongly againstProgramové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 10 Why
The retirement age should keep rising with life expectancy, with no fixed cap.
The law currently links the general retirement age to life expectancy and sets no upper limit: each year a decree fixes it for one age group (in 2026, for people born in 1968). It is lowered by 6 to 18 months for people who have raised children.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 6 in favour, 1 in between and 5 against.
-
Smer AgainstNávrat dôstojnosti do života ľudí (volebný program 2023), s. 5 Why
-
PS Strongly in favourProgram pre budúcnosť Slovenska 2023, kapitola Dôchodky Why
-
Hlas AgainstTASR (teraz.sk), 4. 6. 2026: Tomáš: Vláda bude chcieť prijať dôchodkové stropy pre určité povolania Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In favourVolebný program OĽANO 2023 „Ty rozhodneš“, s. 51 PDF (B.12 Sociálna politika); Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023 Why
-
KDH Strongly in favourVolebný program KDH 2023, s. 97 Why
-
SaS In favourVolebný kompas 2023 (UMB a EUI), autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 3 Why
-
SNS Strongly againstVolebný program SNS 2023, s. 1; Volebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Republika Strongly againstProgram pre rodiny a sociálnu starostlivosť (web hnutia, program 2023, aktualizované 13. 5. 2026) Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Demokrati In favourVolebný program 2023 (Plán pomoci ľuďom), s. 47 a 62 Why
-
Sme rodina In favourVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany Why
-
Právo na pravdu Against
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why
Social and family benefits should be kept, even if taxes have to rise to pay for them.
The public deficit was 4.45% of GDP in 2025. Reducing it means either cutting spending, including benefits, or raising state revenue. In January 2026, 62.9% of people thought fiscal consolidation would make their lives worse that year (AKO).
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 5 in favour, 2 in between and 5 against.
-
Smer In favourNoviny.sk/TASR, 18. 9. 2024: Vláda schválila balík opatrení na konsolidáciu Why
-
PS AgainstTRESK! Totálny reštart ekonomiky Slovenska (2025), s. 31 PDF Why
-
Hlas In favourHLAS – tlačová správa, 14. 10. 2026: Schválený rozpočet na rok 2027 je zodpovedný, sociálny a pomáha ľuďom Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko In favourZmluva so Slovenskom, 10. 9. 2023, body 2 a 4 Why
-
KDH AgainstVolebná kalkulačka KohoVolit 2023, odpoveď strany; Hlasovanie NR SR, tlač 483, 3. 10. 2024 Why
-
SaS Strongly againstReštart Slovenska (program 2027), kap. 1, opatrenie 2; kap. 2, priorita 2 Why
-
SNS In favourSNS, vyhlásenie k štátnemu rozpočtu (sns.sk), 29. 9. 2026 Why
-
Republika In betweenEU&I (euandi) 2024, autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 1 Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In betweenZákladné ciele, madarska-aliancia.sk; Megkezdte a munkát a Magyar Szövetség új elnöksége, 4. 10. 2024 Why
-
Demokrati AgainstEU&I (euandi) 2024, autoumiestnenie strany, výrok 1 Why
-
Sme rodina In favourPetícia proti progresívnym sociálnym experimentom (2023); Program hnutia – Sociálna politika (2026) Why
-
Právo na pravdu AgainstTlačová správa strany Právo na pravdu, 24. 8. 2026 Why
People who are able to work should lose social benefits if they turn down a job or training.
Material-need benefit (dávka v hmotnej núdzi) is currently €86.50 a month for a single person. It is reduced if an adult turns down a suitable job offered by the labour office without good reason, or does not do 32 hours of work a month, for example community work for the municipality.
Of the 12 parties with a position on this question: 7 in favour, 3 in between and 2 against.
-
Smer In favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 727 (pomoc v hmotnej núdzi, „Práca namiesto dávok“), 29. 5. 2025 Why
-
PS AgainstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 727 (pomoc v hmotnej núdzi, „Práca namiesto dávok“), 29. 5. 2025 Why
-
Hlas In favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 727 („Práca namiesto dávok“), 29. 5. 2025; HLAS: Výsledky našej práce v roku 2025 Why
-
Hnutie Slovensko AgainstHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 727 (pomoc v hmotnej núdzi), 2. 4. 2025 a 29. 5. 2025 Why
-
KDH In betweenHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 727 (pomoc v hmotnej núdzi, „Práca namiesto dávok“), 29. 5. 2025 Why
-
SaS In betweenHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 727 (pomoc v hmotnej núdzi, „Práca namiesto dávok“), 29. 5. 2025 Why
-
SNS In favourHlasovanie NR SR, tlač 727 (pomoc v hmotnej núdzi, „Práca namiesto dávok“), 29. 5. 2025 Why
-
Republika In favourProgram pre rodiny a sociálnu starostlivosť (web hnutia, program 2023, aktualizované 13. 5. 2026) Why
-
Maďarská aliancia In favour
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Demokrati In between
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Sme rodina In favour
Estimated position: inferred from the party’s overall programme, without a specific document stating it.
Why -
Právo na pravdu In favourProgramové východiská strany Právo na pravdu (január 2026), s. 12 Why
Explore other issues
Who do you agree with on this issue?
The questions in this issue are part of the full test. On 2 of them the parties hold opposite positions, so your answer matters.
Take the political test